[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compiler warnings for "unused" method specializers
|
From: |
Elias Mårtenson |
|
Subject: |
Re: compiler warnings for "unused" method specializers |
|
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2016 21:01:33 +0800 |
On 14 Oct 2016 2:25 pm, "Eric Abrahamsen" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> So maybe it's not worth adding extra compiler code to handle method
> specializers, but it would be worth allowing multiple _s? I do like the
> use of _ to say "this variable intentionally and permanently ignored".
How about supporting CL-style ignore declarations?
(defun foo (x) (declare (ignore x)) 1)