Re: Can we go GTK-only?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:15:49 -0400
> From: "Perry E. Metzger" <address@hidden>
> Cc: Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
>       address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> On Tue, 01 Nov 2016 19:08:51 +0200 Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden,
> > > address@hidden From: Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>
> > > Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:54:51 -0700
> > >   
> > > >>  > gmalloc is only thread-safe if Emacs is built with
> > > >>  > pthreads.  
> > > >>
> > > >> Yes, and that's what one would expect. If you build Emacs in
> > > >> single-threaded mode, malloc won't be thread-safe. But in the
> > > >> normal case nowadays, malloc should be thread-safe.  
> > > >
> > > > pthreads is not the only way to have threads.  
> > > 
> > > On any modern system POSIX system it is. Counterexample, please.  
> > 
> > You can find them yourself if you are interested.  I have more
> > important things to do with my time.
> 
> You do realize that this means that most of the rest of us are not
> going to take your claim seriously.

And until now you did?  "I am having trouble believing" -- it's your
words.  That's a terrific incentive to continue this discussion.