[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Can we go GTK-only?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Can we go GTK-only? |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:25:02 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> GNU libc on Linux in 2008, it seems:
Since Linux is just the kernel, not the whole system,
this is not "on Linux". In this case, GNU libc is running
on (and as part of) the GNU/Linux system.
Even when you're talking about a past bug, or a present bug, we still
deserve to get some of the credit when you talk about the GNU system.
So would you please call it "GNU/Linux", never just "Linux"?
See http://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and
http://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in
http://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, (continued)
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/03
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/01
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/02
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, John Wiegley, 2016/11/03
- Re: Can we go GTK-only?, John Wiegley, 2016/11/03