Re: [PATCH] Implement letrec without backquote?

[Tino Calancha]

On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Andreas Schwab wrote:

> On Nov 05 2016, Tino Calancha <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Also, i wanted to expand in just one setq call, that is, instead of
> > (setq x 1) (setq y 2) ... (setq foo N)
> > like this:
> > (setq x 1 y 2 ... foo N)
> >
> > But, it seems it's doesn't bring a better efficiency.
>
> That's because setq is a bytecode primitive, and both variants are
> compiled to the same byte code.
>
> Andreas.

Thank you! I was quite puzzle with that behaviour.