[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lldb support
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: lldb support |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2016 20:26:18 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Why would we want to support it
> > rather than saying, "We support GDB -- use that."?
> All the usual reasons people prefer tool A over tool B: compatibility
> with a specific environment, personal customizations, familiarity, and
> personal preference. LLDB is free software. We should support it.
Your argument disregards the important fact that LLDB is part
of a project that aims to replace many important GNU packages,
and its success is the GNU Project's loss.
I think that that is not important to you, but it is very
important for the GNU Project.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/07
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/07
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/07
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/08
- Re: lldb support, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/08
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/08
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Philippe Vaucher, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/14