[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lldb support
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: lldb support |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:24:34 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Your argument disregards the important fact that LLDB is part
> of a project that aims to replace many important GNU packages,
> and its success is the GNU Project's loss.
I believe this is false. LLDB is not a part of that. It's probably
true of a part of LLVM/LLDB/Clang, but let's not get carried away.
Stefan
- Re: lldb support, (continued)
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/07
- Re: lldb support, Perry E. Metzger, 2016/11/07
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/08
- Re: lldb support, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/08
- Re: lldb support, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/08
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Daniel Colascione, 2016/11/09
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: lldb support, Nikolaus Rath, 2016/11/10
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Philippe Vaucher, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Stefan Huchler, 2016/11/11
- Re: lldb support, Richard Stallman, 2016/11/12
- Re: lldb support, John Wiegley, 2016/11/14
- Re: lldb support, Joseph Mingrone, 2016/11/15