Re: lldb support

[Sam Steingold]

> * Richard Stallman <address@hidden> [2016-11-10 20:26:18 -0500]:
>
>   > All the usual reasons people prefer tool A over tool B:
>   > compatibility with a specific environment, personal
>   > customizations, familiarity, and personal preference. LLDB is free
>   > software. We should support it.
>
> Your argument disregards the important fact that LLDB is part
> of a project that aims to replace many important GNU packages,
> and its success is the GNU Project's loss.

What is wrong with replacing a GNU package with a non-GNU
package which is free software?

How is it a loss for GNU?

It seems that if there is a better free debugger than gdb, GNU can
switch the resources currently devoted to gdb to another project.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net http://mideasttruth.com
http://think-israel.org http://thereligionofpeace.com https://jihadwatch.org
Linux: Telling Microsoft where to go since 1991.