[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Testing of the portable dumper branch
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Testing of the portable dumper branch |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:25:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> My take on this is would be to do a giant cleanup (delete all irrelevant
>> branches), but archive these beforehand somewhere "just in case" to be on
>> the safe side.
> We archive them under old-branches.
Exactly. I'm more annoyed at the branches we have in the top-level and
which I believe should be moved to old-branches (such as the
test-concurrency one I queried about on this list recently, with no
answer).
But if someone's worried about its impact on the total size of a "git
clone", we could move old-branches to another repository, tho I expect
those branches use up a negligible amount of space.
Stefan
- Testing of the portable dumper branch, John Wiegley, 2016/12/21
- Re: Testing of the portable dumper branch, ravi desai, 2016/12/21
- Re: Testing of the portable dumper branch, Philippe Vaucher, 2016/12/21
- Re: Testing of the portable dumper branch, Andreas Schwab, 2016/12/21
- Re: Testing of the portable dumper branch,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Testing of the portable dumper branch, John Wiegley, 2016/12/21
- Re: Testing of the portable dumper branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/12/21
- Re: Testing of the portable dumper branch, Stefan Monnier, 2016/12/21
- Re: Testing of the portable dumper branch, Phillip Lord, 2016/12/21