Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden,  address@hidden,  address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:12:22 +0100
> 
> >> It is as bogus as every Lisp error.
> >
> > On the contrary: most of them provide useful information about the
> > error locus.  This one clearly didn't.
> 
> It accurately tells you the form that caused the error, something you
> never get from a Lisp error.

It's accurate, but utterly useless.