[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CEDET Merge
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: CEDET Merge |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2017 20:37:02 +0200 |
> From: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
> Cc: David Engster <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 13:29:58 -0500
>
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> >> I always followed the general rule that the generated ChangeLogs
> >> should have the date when the change enters the Emacs repository
> >
> > Indeed, that is our rule.
>
> That was the rule when ChangeLogs were hand-written, but since the
> switch to generated ChangeLogs it does not (and cannot) apply.
> Git does not record that date.
Git obviously does record the commit date, so there's no problem with
that rule.
> I suggest anyone working on a CEDET merge simply ignore such issues.
I suggest they don't.
- Re: CEDET Merge, (continued)
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/18
- Re: CEDET Merge, Edward John Steere, 2017/01/19
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/19
- Re: CEDET Merge, Karl Fogel, 2017/01/19
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/20
- Re: CEDET Merge, Stefan Monnier, 2017/01/20
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/20
- Re: CEDET Merge, Stefan Monnier, 2017/01/20
- Re: CEDET Merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge, Glenn Morris, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: CEDET Merge, Glenn Morris, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge, Paul Eggert, 2017/01/21
- Re: CEDET Merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/22
- Re: CEDET Merge, Paul Eggert, 2017/01/22
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/22
- Re: CEDET Merge, Edward John Steere, 2017/01/24
- Re: CEDET Merge, Edward John Steere, 2017/01/26
- Re: CEDET Merge, David Engster, 2017/01/26