[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Jan 2017 18:31:54 +0200 |
> Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:27:27 +0000
> From: Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden>
> Cc: Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> To those bugs I would add:
> #23630: Emacs 25.0.94.1: desktop-read loads buffers in the wrong order.
> #19706: Emacs 25.0.50; (+ nil nil -1) in desktop-restore-frameset
When were those last tried? Is it possible that they are fixed on the
release branch?
FWIW, when I finished working on bug#24298, I no longer saw incorrect
order of buffers after restoring the desktop: their order was always
the same, as long as I restored from the same desktop file. Maybe you
just don't like the order in which desktop.el puts them in the desktop
file?
- GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Juanma Barranquero, 2017/01/21
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Juanma Barranquero, 2017/01/21
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Alan Mackenzie, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Juanma Barranquero, 2017/01/22
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, Andreas Schwab, 2017/01/23
- Re: GUI vs TTY when saving & restoring framesets, martin rudalics, 2017/01/23