Re: standard output/error/input streams

[Phillip Lord]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> That does make me realize that I could use `start-process` with an executable
>> that does what I want, and use `process-send-string` to bypass the 
>> involvement
>> of any buffers. Thanks for mentioning it.
>
> Right.  What I was thinking of was to add a `make-file-process`
> primitive so you don't need an external executable.


If we had a function to go to generate a stream from a process then we
could have our cake and eat it.

Phil