Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 1392ec7 2/3: A quicker check for quit

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:45:09 -0800
> 
> This leads me to wonder: what's the point of immediate_quit? If 
> immediate_quit doesn't always cause C-g to immediately quit, why are we 
> bothering with an immediate_quit variable?

It's only tested in the TTY input code, AFAIK.

> Or if immediate_quit makes sense, then should we arrange for a C-g
> under X to behave more like C-g on a terminal, and do a longjmp?

I hope not.