Re: bug#23750: 25.0.95; bug in url-retrieve or json.el

[Elias Mårtenson]

Who is allowed to vote? I consider with-url to be less than ideal and not very clear. with-url-contents is a lot better. 

Regards, 

Elias 

On 25 Jan 2017 4:06 AM, "Lars Ingebrigtsen" <address@hidden> wrote:

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> Perhaps we could have a vote.  The contenders are `with-url',
>> `with-fetched-url', `with-url-contents' and
>> `with-contents-in-a-buffer-fetched-from-somewhere-specified-by-the-following-url'.
>
> I vote against with-url and
> with-contents-in-a-buffer-fetched-from-somewhere-specified-by-the-following-url.
> The other two seem fine,

OK, then we have 1 vote for `with-url', 1.5 votes for `with-fetched-url'
and `with-url-contents' each, and zero for
`with-contents-in-a-buffer-fetched-from-somewhere-specified-by-the-following-url'.

The competition is heating up!

--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no