Re: [Emacs-diffs] feature/byte-switch a75d080: * src/bytecode.c: Refactor to follow GNU coding standards

[Stefan Monnier]

> +                    if (BYTE_CODE_SAFE)
> +                      eassert (!NILP (HASH_HASH (h, i)));

Declaring that non-full hashtables are "dangerous" is rather annoying.
In this case, I think we can do better:

                 Lisp_Object hash_code
                   = make_number (h->test.hashfn (&h->test, v1));

this then lets us use EQ (hash_code, ...) instead of hash_code == XUINT
(...)  which not only correctly skips nil hashes but might even be ever
so slightly faster (both use == on the same size of integers, but the
former avoids the cost of XUINT).


        Stefan