[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Overlays as an AA-tree
From: |
Andreas Politz |
Subject: |
Re: Overlays as an AA-tree |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2017 09:32:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Aren't there established ways to avoid this by reforming the tree?
I don't know.
We could associate a list with every node, as was mentioned earlier,
s.t. every begin position is represented by a unique node, containing
all overlays at this position. But I don't know if it'll worth it.
-ap
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, (continued)
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/20
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/21
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/21
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/21
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/21
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/21
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/24
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Richard Stallman, 2017/02/13
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree,
Andreas Politz <=
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Andreas Politz, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Joakim Jalap, 2017/02/06
- Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/02/06
Re: Overlays as an AA-tree, Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/03