[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging Org tests
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Merging Org tests |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:20:55 +0200 |
> From: Rasmus <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:10:30 +0100
>
> I understand that it would be desirable to include the Org tests in Emacs.
Yes, I think so.
> The readme/file-organization file in the "test" dir of emacs.git is a bit
> confusing. Why does it talk about an "automated" folder that isn't there?
> I guess it's simply "lisp" folder.
Yes, that was a left-over from the old organization. I fixed the
text.
> Also, how strictly must the suggested file organization be followed?
> Skimming "make-test-deps.emacs-lisp" it seems it might have to be followed
> rather strictly. In Org, tests are already organized into a different
> file hierarchy and use a slightly different naming scheme.
Is it a problem to change Org test files to follow the current
organization below test/? IOW, put all the Org files in
test/lisp/org/?
> What would be the best strategy for including the Org tests in the Emacs
> repo?
>
> 1. Include Org tests in the "manual" folder and keep the current structure.
> 2. Start to reorganize the tests in the Org repo to follow the Emacs
> scheme.
> 3. Keep tests in the Org repo.
My preference is 2, if it's feasible.
Thanks.