[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool)
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool) |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2017 08:22:20 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Understood. Do you have then any better idea for the name of this
> function? beginning-of-defun--incomment-line-p seems to specific,
> in-comment-line-p _may_ be indeed too general.
I'll let someone else decide if it deserves a "non-prefixed" name, but
as for the name after the potential prefix, I think focusing on
"comment" is the wrong idea. Maybe `insignificant-line-p`? Or
`emptyish-line-p`?
Stefan
- Re: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool), (continued)
- Re: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool), John Wiegley, 2017/02/13
- Re: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool), Marcin Borkowski, 2017/02/14
- Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool), Dmitry Gutov, 2017/02/14
- Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool), Marcin Borkowski, 2017/02/14
- Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool), Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/14
- Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool), Marcin Borkowski, 2017/02/15
- Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool), Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/15
- Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool), Marcin Borkowski, 2017/02/15
- Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool), Stefan Monnier, 2017/02/15
- Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool), Marcin Borkowski, 2017/02/15
- Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool),
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool), Marcin Borkowski, 2017/02/17