Re: If records are not sequences, why does aref work on records?

[Lars Brinkhoff]

Clément Pit-Claudel <address@hidden> writes:
>> Not any more.  When I made my change, I found this part of the manual
>> and deleted the text in parentheses.  And also changed much of the
>> other places you quoted.
>
> Yup, of course; it was natural to update the manual along with the
> change.  I was pointing to the documentation as it was when people
> introduced the `arefs' and 'cl-defstruct' whose validity is now under
> discussion in my their code, because the question was whether people
> should have known that using `aref' this way was relying on an
> implementation detail.

Oh, I see.  Yes, I agree with your point.