[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?
From: |
Jean-Christophe Helary |
Subject: |
Before l10n, better practices for (message) ? |
Date: |
Tue, 23 May 2017 08:30:35 +0900 |
I just bumped into an English/code bug this morning. In package.el, when 1
package is not needed anymore, the message is:
"Package menu: Operation finished. 1 packages are no longer needed, type ‘M-x
package-autoremove’ to remove them"
The error comes from the following (message) on line 3273
(message "Package menu: Operation finished. %d packages %s"
(length removable)
(substitute-command-keys
"are no longer needed, type `\\[package-autoremove]' to remove
them"))
So I'm asking whether do we have "best practices" for using messages...
Jean-Christophe
- Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?,
Jean-Christophe Helary <=
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Tino Calancha, 2017/05/22
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/22
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/22
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/22
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/23
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/23
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/23
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/23
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Paul Eggert, 2017/05/24
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/24