[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ? |
Date: |
Fri, 26 May 2017 22:00:21 +0300 |
> From: Yuri Khan <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 01:08:20 +0700
> Cc: Jean-Christophe Helary <address@hidden>,
> Emacs developers <address@hidden>
>
> (require 'gettext)
>
> (message (dgettext "hello" "Hello World!"))
>
> Gettext also has a helper function named gettext and aliased _, which
> use the domain set by an earlier invocation of textdomain(). In Elisp,
> it seems most natural to express that like this:
>
> (defun hello-_ (key)
> (dgettext "hello" key))
> (message (hello-_ "Hello World!"))
>
> The function hello-_ would be defined once in the hello package and
> then used throughout it. Another package would define its own wrapper
> around dgettext, with a different domain.
>
>
> Inside, dgettext could consult a two-level hashtable, first keyed by
> domain, second by key. Alternatively, a domain could be a hashtable
> variable; in the latter case:
>
> ;; in hello.el
> (defvar hello-domain nil)
> (defun hello-_ (key)
> (dgettext hello-domain key))
> (message (hello-_ "Hello World!"))
>
> ;; in gettext.el
> (defun dgettext (domain key)
> (gethash key domain key))
Why not hide all this ugliness inside 'message'?
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, (continued)
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/24
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/23
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/23
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/23
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Yuri Khan, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Etienne Prud’homme, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Etienne Prud’homme, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Etienne Prud’homme, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Marcin Borkowski, 2017/05/27