Re: binding S-mouse-1

[Tak Kunihiro]

>> I think internal consistency between mouse-1 and S-mouse-1 also
>> matters as well as behavior of S-mouse-1 across applications.
> 
> The current binding of S-mouse-1 was not taken out of thin air, it was
> modeled on other applications as well, AFAIR.

I suppose that you also infer consistency across applications.  If so,
targeting applications matter, I think.


>>> All that just to provide some kind of "consistency"?  I'm not sure
>>> it's a good enough reason for changing such a veteran behavior.

>> Shift should modify operation by mouse-1.  I think `extend region' can
>> be regarded as modified set-point; however mouse-appearance-menu has
>> significant distance from set-point.

> But I don't think we should change the default behavior of S-mouse-1.

How do you think about reason that I inferred, consistency within
Emacs?