Re: org-merger questions

[Kyle Meyer]

Hi Rasmus,

Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:

[I see that most of this message is addressed by the next post, but ...]

>> And a question:
>>
>>   * Should we include the "@set DATE ..." when we replace "@include
>>     org-version.inc" in Emacs's org.texi?  It doesn't seem like we have
>>     in the past (e.g., in Emacs's 6f66f53f65).
>
> I don’t know.  I think we should be bound by the Emacs practice, not what
> was done in the last sync aeon ago.  Principally, I think documents should
> be dated.  I don’t know if it’s right in an Emacs context, as it carries
> its own date.  idlwave.texi and elisp.texi are the only other dated texi
> files.  

OK, I don't have a strong preference either way.  In the future, I'll
add the date line when I replace the "@include org-version.inc" line in
the emacs-sync branch.

-- 
Kyle