Re: org-merger questions

[Rasmus]

Hi,

>> I don’t know.  I think we should be bound by the Emacs practice, not what
>> was done in the last sync aeon ago.  Principally, I think documents should
>> be dated.  I don’t know if it’s right in an Emacs context, as it carries
>> its own date.  idlwave.texi and elisp.texi are the only other dated texi
>> files.  
>
> OK, I don't have a strong preference either way.  In the future, I'll
> add the date line when I replace the "@include org-version.inc" line in
> the emacs-sync branch.

Neither do I.  If there's an Emacs policy we should follow that.
Otherwise, I think the best thing is to use the date of the release.  But
other people may think differently.  In any case, it’s a minor issue.

-- 
Lasciate ogni speranza o voi che entrate: siete nella mani di'machellaio