Re: Native display of line numbers: visual line-counting

[James Nguyen]

>> First, this makes sense only for relative line numbers, right?  If not
>> I don't really understand what would be the definition of "visually
>> counted first line shown in a window".  If everyone agrees, it would
>> mean that the current line will have the number of zero, right?  or do
>> people still want to see the "physical line number" for the current
>> line in this case?

I am thinking about it in terms of code folding.
Each fold becomes the mark of the new line number.

1. static int internal_self_insert (int, EMACS_INT); // Absolute line number of 
1
1. DEFUN ("forward-point", Fforward_point, Sforward_point, 1, 1, 0,
2.        doc: /* Return buffer position N characters after (before if N 
negative) point.  */)
3.   (Lisp_Object n)
4. {
5.   CHECK_NUMBER (n);
6. 
7.   return make_number (PT + XINT (n));
8. }
9. 
10. 
11. static Lisp_Object
12. move_point (Lisp_Object n, bool forward)
13. {
14.   SET_PT (new_point);
15.   return Qnil;
16. }

Becomes

1. static int internal_self_insert (int, EMACS_INT); {} // FOLD // Absolute 
Line number of 1
1. 
2. 
3. static Lisp_Object
4. move_point (Lisp_Object n, bool forward) {} // FOLD

I'd like the current line to still represent the current absolute line number
of the file.


> On Jun 24, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> So a few people requested this feature, and I started thinking about
> its implementation.  Immediately I bumped into several issues that I'm
> not sure how to resolve, since I don't really understand how this will
> be used in Emacs.
> 
> First, this makes sense only for relative line numbers, right?  If not
> I don't really understand what would be the definition of "visually
> counted first line shown in a window".  If everyone agrees, it would
> mean that the current line will have the number of zero, right?  or do
> people still want to see the "physical line number" for the current
> line in this case?
> 
> Next, the only use case which I fully understand is the one with
> some of the lines folded, as in Org or Outline modes.  More
> accurately, the case where text is not displayed because it was made
> invisible by the 'invisible' property of some kind -- these lines are
> not to be counted under this mode.
> 
> But that is not the only case where what is displayed does not
> correspond to buffer text 1:1.  Some text on the screen might come
> from display properties or from before- and after-strings.  These can
> include embedded newlines, and this contribute to "visual lines" Emacs
> displays.  Are these lines to be counted or not?  Should Emacs display
> something for their "line numbers" or not?
> 
> We need to resolve all these and possibly other subtleties before the
> feature can be implemented.  Ideas and opinions are welcome.
> 
> TIA
>