Re: Native line numbers landed on master

[Stefan Monnier]

> Looks okay, although I'd drop the # part in the below:
>   (add-hook 'pre-command-hook #'display-line-numbers-update-width nil t))

Recent Elisp changes have rather gone the other way (adding a # rather
than removing them).  Part of the reason is that lexical-binding gives
different semantics to '(lambda ...) and #'(lambda ...), other part is
that cl-flet and cl-labels also give different semantics to 'foo and
#'foo.

Finally, if you keep the # part, the byte-compiler will be able to check
that you spelled the function correctly (and warn you if that function
is not known to exist).


        Stefan