[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:00:29 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Thanks for checking 10 packages. Your report makes the issue
completely clear.
This one package might actually be ok.
> ttl-mode Two-clause BSD licence
Is the license properly applied? If so, I guess the license-checking
scripts should be fixed to take notice of it.
The rest are all real problems of greater or lesser severity.
> achievements No license
> gap-mode No license
> riscv-mode README.md says GPLv3+ but source file lacks license information
> zig-mode No license
> airline-themes No license
> ghc According to LICENSE file: AGPL3 but files with BSD3 exists
> darkane-theme No license
> kpm-list Home made license!?
> google-this Incomplete GPL license
For the moment, I don't think I need any more information about the
other packages. The overall outlines of the problem are clear enough,
and one package more or less in each category won't change it much.
I will study the right way to address the situation.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, (continued)
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/12
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/13
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/14
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Mats Lidell, 2017/07/15
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/15
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/07/15
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/07/16
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Mats Lidell, 2017/07/16
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Mats Lidell, 2017/07/16
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/17
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/17
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Mats Lidell, 2017/07/17
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/18
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Mats Lidell, 2017/07/23
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Mats Lidell, 2017/07/27
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/28
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Mats Lidell, 2017/07/29
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/29
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Mats Lidell, 2017/07/29
- Re: Some hard numbers on licenses used by elisp packages, Ivan Andrus, 2017/07/29