Re: C99 compound literals in c-mode

[Helmut Eller]

On Tue, Aug 15 2017, Stefan Monnier wrote:

>> C-mode doesn’t seem to understand C99’s compound literals, resulting in
>> rather broken indentation.  Is this correct and, if so, how difficult would
>> it be to add support for it?
>
> Could you show some example problematic code?

I think code like this:

int foo (void)
{
  return (struct bar) { .f1 = 10,
                         .f2 = 20,
                         };
}

should be indented better.  Maybe so:

  return (struct bar) { .f1 = 10,
                        .f2 = 20,
                      };

There are also strange interactions with declarations, eg. adding a
a declaration before the return changes the indentation to:

int foo (void)
{
  int i = 1;
  return (struct bar) { .f1 = 10,
      .f2 = 20,
      };
}

Helmut