Re: [OFFTOPIC] Re: Licence of ts-comint

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> "PE" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:

PE> The shepherd drives the wolf from the sheep's throat, for which the sheep
PE> thanks the shepherd as his liberator, while the wolf denounces him for the
PE> same act.... Plainly, the sheep and the wolf are not agreed upon a
PE> definition of the word liberty.

That's a great example, Paul. Not sure I see it fitting our legal discussion
(which has more complex dimensions), but I like how it clarifies the
importance of "point of view".

I'll desist from further debate on emacs-devel about licensure, however, since
I don't want anyone to confuse my opinions as an individual with my role as an
FSF project maintainer. I have no issue with Emacs choosing to use the GPL,
and have always licensed my own contributions to Emacs under the same.

-- 
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature