|
From: | Dmitry Gutov |
Subject: | Re: Regarding Emacs, js.el, template-strings and syntax-tables |
Date: | Sun, 27 Aug 2017 19:37:57 +0300 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/56.0 |
On 8/24/17 5:20 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:
whereas from what you say in Ruby this is sufficiently rare that we may prefer to use another approach (that doesn't work as well in the general case but is nicer in the simple(&common) case).
I disagree that Ruby is sufficiently different. Maybe arbitrary nesting is not as frequent, but it happens, and some other editors support it better than Emacs.
As soon as we fix that, I'd switch to resetting to the default face for the nested expression.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |