Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 4612b2a 1/2: Implement and-let*

[Richard Stallman]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > >     (internal--build-binding-value-form): Extend to account for
  > >     solitary symbols and (EXPR) items in binding varlist.

  > We're forced to accept those forms in `let` and `let*` for historical
  > reasons,

It is not just a matter of history.
Those are very convenient in 'let'.
It would be a bad idea not to have them.

Whether they are useful in other new constructs, I don't know.
What do these new constructs look like?

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.