Re: [PATCH] timer-list -> list-timers?

[Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo]

Ted Zlatanov writes:

> On Sat, 16 Sep 2017 20:56:53 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen 
> <address@hidden> wrote:  
>
> LI> I guess I was just adhering to the `<package>-function' 
> naming LI> convention.  I'm all for renaming it to 
> `list-timers'. 
>
> That kind of bugs me about `M-x list-packages' etc. (there's a 
> whole bunch of them, like `list-holidays' and so on). Is there 
> any rule about when to make an exception to the 
> `<package>-function' naming convention?  If not, should there be 
> one? 

I agree. These functions that don't follow the package naming 
convention are always hard to find. Wouldn't `timer-list-timers', 
`package-list-packages', `holidays-list-holidays', etc be better?
--
Jorge.