Re: [PATCH] timer-list -> list-timers?

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: address@hidden (Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo)
> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 12:17:31 -0400
> 
> Ted Zlatanov writes:
> 
> > That kind of bugs me about `M-x list-packages' etc. (there's a 
> > whole bunch of them, like `list-holidays' and so on). Is there 
> > any rule about when to make an exception to the 
> > `<package>-function' naming convention?  If not, should there be 
> > one? 
> 
> I agree. These functions that don't follow the package naming 
> convention are always hard to find.

Doesn't "M-x apropos" help?