Re: [PATCH] Fixing package-initialize, adding early init file

[Radon Rosborough]

> Why would there be (setq package-initialized nil) in the early init file?
> I could imagine there being
>
>     (setq package-initialized t)
>
> OTOH, to inhibit subsequent initialization of package.el.

Whoops, that was indeed what I meant to say. But I still argue that
the readability is hurt, because (setq package-initialized t) is
basically a lie: you're saying that package.el was initialized
already, when in fact the purpose is quite possibly to ensure that
package.el is *never* initialized.