Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file

emacs-devel

From:	Paul Eggert
Subject:	Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file
Date:	Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:44:15 -0800
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0

Jim Meyering wrote:

things changed so that
byte-compiling such a source file name requires the relative directory
name first be created in $TMPDIR.

Was that deliberate?


I can't imagine that it was, no.

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file, Jim Meyering, 2017/11/22
- Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file, Paul Eggert, 2017/11/22
  - Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file, Jim Meyering, 2017/11/23
    - Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/23
    - Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file, Jim Meyering, 2017/11/23
    - Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/23
    - Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file, Jim Meyering, 2017/11/26
    - Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/27
    - Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file, Jim Meyering, 2017/11/28
    - Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file, Paul Eggert <=
    - Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/29
    - Re: automake's .el support vs. recent loss of byte-compile-dest-file, Jim Meyering, 2017/11/29