Re: Delimited continuations

[Michael Heerdegen]

"John Wiegley" <address@hidden> writes:

> HM> (+ 1 2) is executed twice. I think this isn't necessarily so?
>
> Yes, except if you think about it, this "initial evaluation" whose
> results are thrown away can be used to establish lexical bindings to
> be captured by the lambda passed to shift; or to influence which shift
> is used within a complicated reset block.

This can be done in the "first run".  I think it's the "second run" that
is "too much" because it doesn't belong to the limited continuation of
the context of `shift'.


Michael.