[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: pcase-if-let?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: pcase-if-let? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Mar 2018 21:49:16 -0700 (PDT) |
> Yes, your are right with everything, the names are nonsense. I guess we
> are still in some kind of intermediate state - AFAIK Stefan hopes to
> integrate the pcase stuff more into Emacs innards some day. Dealing
> with these wide problems is not what I want to do here. For now, I just
> want to be consistent with the existing naming scheme.
I understand. And I really didn't expect name-changes at
this point. Just wanted to mention that the names of these
`pcase-*' things are not so helpful. It would have been
better to start off with better thinking about the names,
but we're past that now, it seems.
- pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/28
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Davis Herring, 2018/03/28
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/28
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/28
- RE: pcase-if-let?, Drew Adams, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/29
- RE: pcase-if-let?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/03/29
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/29
- RE: pcase-if-let?, Drew Adams, 2018/03/30
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/30
- RE: pcase-if-let?, Drew Adams, 2018/03/30
- Re: pcase-if-let?, Michael Heerdegen, 2018/03/30