[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port? |
Date: |
Wed, 23 May 2018 20:23:55 +0300 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 12:37:39 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, Nick Helm <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> >> And, I guess, how does emacsclient beat this one-frame-must-exist
> >> limitation – does it maintain some kind of fake frame that it hides from
> >> the windowing system?
> > That's exactly why your notion of frame-centric Emacs is inaccurate.
>
> IIRC, the emacs daemon solves this by using the "initial-frame" which is
> associated to the "stdio terminal" (the special frame and terminal also
> used in batch mode).
Yes, but if you count that as a frame, then the one-frame-must-exist
limitation is meaningless, because that frame always exists, it comes
from the time Emacs was dumped.
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, (continued)
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Nick Helm, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Philipp Stephani, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Nick Helm, 2018/05/23
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Nick Helm, 2018/05/23
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/23
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/05/23
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/23
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/24
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Philipp Stephani, 2018/05/24
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Philipp Stephani, 2018/05/24
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/24
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/15
Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/17