[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2018 13:51:44 +0200 |
Van L <address@hidden> writes:
>> Robert Pluim writes:
>>
>> The intent was to push you to install GNU Mailutils, since thatʼs a
>> better replacement for Emacs's built-in movemail. Can we improve the message?
>
> The message could point to the place where the TODO file is for NS Port and
> leave instructions for how to get email going inside of Emacs.
>
I meant specifically the message about Mailutils.
> I have the following details to fill in the gaps:
>
> https://wiki.gandi.net/en/mail/imap
>
> I couldn’t make up my mind which to pick Rmail or Gnus.
>
> Gnus is newer? and I wanted to try newsserver but it wasn’t obvious where my
> Internet provider put that.
Those are all valid questions, but the answers should not be in the
output of ./configure
Robert
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, (continued)
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Stefan Monnier, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/21
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Van L, 2018/05/21
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/22
- Off Topic (was: Should this package be included into the NS port?), Van L, 2018/05/22
- Re: Off Topic (was: Should this package be included into the NS port?), Alan Third, 2018/05/23
- emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure (was: Off Topic), Van L, 2018/05/23
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure, Robert Pluim, 2018/05/24
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure, Van L, 2018/05/24
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure,
Robert Pluim <=
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure, Van L, 2018/05/24
- Re: emacs-26.1-rc1: ./configure, Van L, 2018/05/24
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/22
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/22
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Nick Helm, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Alan Third, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Philipp Stephani, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, George Plymale II, 2018/05/19
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Nick Helm, 2018/05/23
- Re: Should this package be included into the NS port?, Nick Helm, 2018/05/23