[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new-flex-completion-style
From: |
João Távora |
Subject: |
Re: new-flex-completion-style |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 09:16:27 +0000 |
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:35 PM Stefan Monnier
<address@hidden> wrote:
> > + Fcons (Qcategory, Qbuffer),
> > + Fcons (Qcycle_sort_function, Qidentity));
> > else
> > return Qnil;
> > }
> That easy, huh?
Yep, and does the right thing default-wise, too. If I'm not mistaken,
I'd say it behaves exactly like ido-switch-to-buffer now, which doesn't
use score-based sorting, when icomplete-mode is used with the
new flex completion style.
BTW, has the council of completion elders reached any sort of
white-smoke decision vis-à-vis where to score-sort?
> I think a more precise description would be that cycle-sort-function now
> also overrides the use of minibuffer-history-variable.
That's in the commit message's subject line, but OK I've changed it.
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, (continued)
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, João Távora, 2019/02/14
- RE: new-flex-completion-style, Drew Adams, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, João Távora, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/14
- RE: new-flex-completion-style, Drew Adams, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/14
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, Dmitry Gutov, 2019/02/15
- RE: new-flex-completion-style, Drew Adams, 2019/02/15
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, João Távora, 2019/02/18
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/18
- Re: new-flex-completion-style,
João Távora <=
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/19
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, João Távora, 2019/02/19
- Re: new-flex-completion-style, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/19
RE: new-flex-completion-style (was: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/ 2c75775 2/2: Score, sort and annotate flex-style completions according to match tightness), Drew Adams, 2019/02/11