Re: master f117b5df4d: Add new functions eol and bol

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 19.08.2022 16:25, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Bikeshed welcome about the names, though.  I considered `point-bol', for
> instance, but that's very similar to `point-at-bol' (which is an alias
> for `line-beginning-position').
>
> The nice thing about `point-bol' is that it'd be symmetric with
> `point-min':

I guess the main problem is one cannot tell, from the names only, that 
these functions are different (not aliases), and that the difference is 
related to "fields".

Adding an optional argument to existing functions is not an option, I 
take it?

It could also be a dynamic var which alters behavior. At some point we 
could flip its default value.