emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: emacs-29 44ebd9cbd56 2/2: Eglot: explain how to update Eglot in manu


From: João Távora
Subject: Re: emacs-29 44ebd9cbd56 2/2: Eglot: explain how to update Eglot in manual (bug#62720)
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 00:31:23 +0100

On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 11:48 PM Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> wrote:
>
> On 28/04/2023 03:35, João Távora wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 12:53 AM Dmitry Gutov<dmitry@gutov.dev>  wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> On 28/04/2023 02:39, João Távora wrote:
> >>>       * lisp/progmodes/eglot.el (eglot-update): New command.
> >> Should it be called eglot-upgrade now as well?
> > No objection, don't feel strongly about it.  If you want to
> > change it, go ahead, but remember to change the manual as
> > well.
>
> Ok, I did the rename.

Hmmm, unfortunate.  I thought you had abandoned the idea,
as you didn't reply to that part specifically.  The problem
is that Eglot 1.15, released in the meantime, now has
eglot-update.  So I think we should rename it back in Emacs 29,
sorry. Either that or release Eglot 1.16 asap.

> Two more things:
>
> - Commit 44ebd9cbd56 also removed the call to (eldoc) from the end of
> eglot-completion-at-point which has been there for a few years. Was that
> intentional? Didn't look like it.

Not intentional no.  Well, at least not for that commit.
Not pretty, but I wouldn't worry about it.

> - Consider the issue that I brought up in
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/62720#715 regarding (cadr (assoc 'eglot
> package-archive-contents)). I'm not sure there's even a guarantee that
> the available versions are sorted, but even if they are obeying
> package-archive-priorities seems like a good idea. Though I can
> understand if it's not your first priority in this command.

Is this a problem that can affect the Eglot package
specifically?  In which conditions?

João



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]