[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496) |
Date: |
Fri, 05 May 2023 16:31:14 +0300 |
> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: tbading@web.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 05 May 2023 20:29:29 +0800
>
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> Anyway, I don't object to explaining what we call ``minimized'', as long
> >> as it is confined to some short introductory text in the manual. But we
> >> should never use the term ``minimized'' ourselves.
> >
> > That's not the current policy, and I see no reason to enforce such
> > restrictions. So please stop pushing others to adopt your personal
> > preferences.
>
> There are at least two reasons:
>
> 1. the term ``minimize'' does not make sense, at least on the common
> free desktops.
>
> 2. Emacs minimizes windows, while it iconifies frames. Type M-x
> minimize-window RET, then see what happens.
I hear you, but I still don't see that as good enough reasons to stop
using "minimize frames" as well. I explained my reasons already, and
IMO they are more important than the ones you present.
Re: icon-title-format vs. frame-title-format (Bug#61496), Tobias Bading, 2023/05/05