emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode


From: Dmitry Gutov
Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 03:38:45 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0

On 28/08/2023 03:21, Po Lu wrote:
Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev> writes:

Yeah, a program written in C/C++/Rust which contains an interpreter
(and multiple jit's) for a dynamic programming language and has most
of its interface written in it, supports user extensions in the same
language, support display of arbitrary files and has several related
but different mechanisms for guiding the visuals and the layout of
said display. It also supports bidi.

Using Bidi implementations which already exist, implementing standards
already specified, and applying foreknowledge acquired through the
development of other implementations of those standards, correct?

Something that we'd happily do as well, wouldn't we?

When was the last time Firefox concerned itself with DPMI memory
extenders?  The disparate means of obtaining boot times on different
Unix and Microsoft systems?  File ACLs, SELinux, D-Bus, inode
notifications, ELF, xcoff, the 9k800 aout?

Sorry if I'm not up-to-date with each and every component, but Firefox devs surely have to deal with SELinux, D-Bus, and executable formats.

JavaScript also has a filesystem access API.

The scale and rapid development that is mandatory for a functioning web
browser sounds impressive, but is ultimately narrow in scope.  Emacs's
requirements are less imposing but greater in number,

...

which compounded
by a group of active developers whose number pales in comparison to that
of Firefox, means that reducing the strain on any one of them is an
overriding objective.

Even if that were the case, the plan breaks as soon as we run out of existing active developers, if we fail to recruit enough new ones.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]