[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: master c916f471caa 2/3: Add tree-sitter performance note
From: |
Yuan Fu |
Subject: |
Re: master c916f471caa 2/3: Add tree-sitter performance note |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Sep 2023 21:08:37 -0700 |
> On Sep 13, 2023, at 6:43 PM, Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> branch: master
>> commit c916f471caada4eb9a4b7f9f53925a71525c694a
>> Author: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
>> Commit: Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>
>>
>> Add tree-sitter performance note
>> ---
>> admin/notes/tree-sitter/performance | 12 ++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/admin/notes/tree-sitter/performance
>> b/admin/notes/tree-sitter/performance
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..0e8351403af
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/admin/notes/tree-sitter/performance
>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
>> +TREE-SITTER PERFORMANCE NOTES -*- org -*-
>> +
>> +* Facts
>> +
>> +Incremental parsing of a few characters worth of edit usually takes
>> +less than 0.1ms. If it takes longer than that, something is wrong. There’s
>> one time where I found tree-sitter-c takes ~30ms to incremental parse.
>> Updating to the latest version of tree-sitter-c solves it, so I didn’t
>> investigate further.
>
> Shouldn't this paragraph be filled to 72 columns, as you have done in
> the next one?
Indeed it should. Thanks for catching this. I use word-wrap so filled and
unfilled paragraph look the same to me, apparently I forgot to fill this
paragraph.
Yuan