Re: How to make aot native-compilation and pdmp creation reproduceable

[Gerd Möllmann]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> AIAIU, the assumption that an .el file has changed doesn't hold.
>> Instead, comp.el prints a constant list and produces a different $n=
>> label in both cases.  The diff of the .eln's shows that.  If there are
>> no further diffs in the .eln that weren't shown, everything else is
>> identical.
>
> Once again: why is x-win.el being ELN-compiled in the first place?
> Are you saying that every time you say "make", we compile all the
> preloaded *.el files, even if they didn't change?  That is definitely
> not true.  So the question IMO is: why is x-win.eln being regenerated?

I think we are miscommunicating.

I build nothing, Björn does.  As I understand him, he builds 2 times
_from scratch_, finds that the builds have diffs, which he showed, and
asked what could be the cause, which I answered to.