[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ELPA] New package: dape
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: [ELPA] New package: dape |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Nov 2023 10:00:10 +0000 |
Daniel Pettersson <daniel@dpettersson.net> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:35 PM Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net> wrote:
>> Did we ever come to a conclusion on this point?
>
> Sorry I have been putting the naming thing off as this thread sparked
> a bit of interest in the package which lead to a lot of great input and
> bugfixing. There have been a lot of good suggestions and no consensus
> which has made the even task harder.
In the end that is your call, it is just currently a blocking issue
before we add the package to GNU ELPA.
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dape, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/11/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dape, Dmitry Gutov, 2023/11/01
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dape, João Távora, 2023/11/02
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dape, Adam Porter, 2023/11/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dape, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dape, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/11/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dape, Adam Porter, 2023/11/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dape, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/11/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dape, Adam Porter, 2023/11/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dape, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/11/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dape, Adam Porter, 2023/11/04
- Re: [ELPA] New package: dape, João Távora, 2023/11/04