Re: CCing thread participants through gnus+gmane

[Eric Abrahamsen]

Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@janestreet.com> writes:

> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 5:45 PM Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@janestreet.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2023, 16:40 Spencer Baugh <sbaugh@janestreet.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >  João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
>>> >  > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 11:18 PM Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>> >  >> What I meant is, using it with the Elisp implementation didn't
>>> >  >> convince me of the usefulness of the feature. Perhaps you disagree?
>>> >  >>
>>> >  >> Or it would be nice to hear from someone who have tried out Eglot's
>>> >  >> integration and found more upsides there.
>>> >  >
>>> >  > If you want that to happen, the only realistic way to have good
>>> >  > feedback from anyone else other than emacs-devel nerds like me and you
>>> >  > is to release an Eglot version with  this feature, which we can change
>>> >  > later (even non-backward-compatibly, within a reasonable time frame).
>>> >
>>> >  I tried the Eglot integration, my comments elsewhere are inspired by
>>> >  that.
>>> >
>>> > Can you point me to this "elsewhere"?
>>>
>>> Elsewhere in this thread - my message on Tue, 07 Nov 2023 11:51:49 -0500
>>
>> OK, I found it.  It's useful, and very commonly done, if you CC the
>> participants in this discussion, particularly when addressing their
>> contributions.
>> Your emails are sent only to emacs-devel and it's easier for me to
>> miss them.
>
> Sorry about that... I fully agree about CCing, but for $REASONS I have
> to use gmane to interact with emacs-devel.  Does anyone happen to know
> if there's a way to get gmane+gnus to CC participants?

Usually what you do (as I've done here) is hit "S W". That ends up
replying To the original author and Cc'ing emacs-devel, but same difference...