[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Instead of pcase
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Instead of pcase |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Nov 2023 22:06:20 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > But don't argue that this cost does not exist, simply because it
> > doesn't feel like a burden to you.
> Hmm, I must say that cost was small for me. There is also a cost of
> reading a more complicated rewrite using less suited language
> constructs.
It would not be more complicated in substance. It would only be less
terse in the way it is written.
> I wonder how that would look like and if it would really be simpler. Or
> if it would be structurally more or less equivalent and only avoid the
> concise syntax.
I hope it will be similar but avoid the tersd syntax.
I have not finished design it, but I made some progress today.
Would you like to help design matching functions to do the same jobs
that pcase does? I would like to make it possible to combine
various matching and destructuring functions using `and' and `or'
(plus any other Lisp functions you like).
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Instead of pcase, (continued)
Re: Instead of pcase, Richard Stallman, 2023/11/25
Re: Instead of pcase, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/11/16
Re: Instead of pcase,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Instead of pcase, Spencer Baugh, 2023/11/16
combining cond and let, to replace pcase., Richard Stallman, 2023/11/17