[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code for cond*
From: |
Po Lu |
Subject: |
Re: Code for cond* |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2024 22:34:56 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
> FYI, I cannot understand the argument you are making.
It was not addressed specifically to you. My point is that the same
crowd who were defending cl-lib and pcase as though their life was at
stake are now pushing for the exclusion of an alternative, which
everyone can see the irony in.
- Re: Code for cond*, (continued)
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, João Távora, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*,
Po Lu <=
- Re: Code for cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, João Távora, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Emanuel Berg, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Ihor Radchenko, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Emanuel Berg, 2024/01/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/25
- Re: Code for cond*, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2024/01/25
- Re: Code for cond*, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/01/25
- Re: Code for cond*, Po Lu, 2024/01/25
- Re: Code for cond*, Emanuel Berg, 2024/01/25